NorthStar Logistics Acquisition of RouteWave TMS: BCG-Style M&A Case Interview

NorthStar Logistics Acquisition of RouteWave TMS is a medium-difficulty BCG-style M&A case interview with 8 interviewer questions and 4 exhibits; candidates finish it in a median 20 minutes. Your first full case is free with an account: run it out loud with an AI interviewer or step by step.

Key facts for NorthStar Logistics Acquisition of RouteWave TMS: type, industry, firm style, difficulty, questions, exhibits, modes, practice data and source.
Case typeM&A
IndustryLogistics / SaaS
Firm styleBCG
DifficultyMedium
Interviewer questions8: context, clarifying, structure, 3 analysis, math, synthesis
Math questions1
Exhibits4
ModesVoice and guided
Completed runs39
Median time20 minutes
SourceWritten by Road to Offer

Runs, times and ratings are from Road to Offer practice data as of 6 November 2026.

The case

NorthStar Logistics, a U.S. third-party logistics player, is considering acquiring RouteWave, a transportation management software provider. RouteWave shareholders are asking for an enterprise value of $360M. The CEO wants to decide whether to proceed and what conditions are required for value creation.

NorthStar manages freight operations for mid-market shippers and wants to improve margin and customer retention through better digital capabilities. RouteWave has strong route-optimization IP and sticky SaaS contracts, but integration would require combining commercial teams and data systems. The board wants a clear valuation view and execution guardrails before signing.

The interviewer's first question

Could you restate the client situation and the core decision we need to make?

Exhibits you will read

  1. Exhibit 1: RouteWave Financial Performance, 2022-2024 ($M)
  2. Exhibit 2: Peer Multiples vs Growth (Logistics SaaS, peer median 11.8x)
  3. Exhibit 3: Value Bridge to Maximum Justified Offer ($M)
  4. Exhibit 4: Integration Risk by Workstream (1=Low, 5=High)

What this case tests

One math step, four exhibits and three analysis questions: this case is mostly about reading data under time pressure.